NumberAuthorDateTitle
30978Brent J. Ermlick2004-02-12Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
30995Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-02-12Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31026P&G2004-02-13Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31037enlil@...2004-02-14Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31053elmeras20002004-02-14[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31094P&G2004-02-15Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31104enlil@...2004-02-16Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31114elmeras20002004-02-16[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31117tgpedersen2004-02-16[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31119elmeras20002004-02-16[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31135P&G2004-02-17Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31148Miguel Carrasquer2004-02-17Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31149Marco Moretti2004-02-17[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31165P&G2004-02-18Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31167enlil@...2004-02-18a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31171enlil@...2004-02-18Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31174elmeras20002004-02-19[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31175elmeras20002004-02-19Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31184Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-02-19Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31186P&G2004-02-19Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31188P&G2004-02-19Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31194enlil@...2004-02-20Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31195P&G2004-02-20Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31197elmeras20002004-02-20[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31199elmeras20002004-02-21Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31201P&G2004-02-21Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31202Miguel Carrasquer2004-02-21Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31203elmeras20002004-02-21[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31206Richard Wordingham2004-02-22Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31207elmeras20002004-02-22Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31214enlil@...2004-02-23Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31216enlil@...2004-02-23Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31220elmeras20002004-02-23[tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31226P&G2004-02-24Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31227P&G2004-02-24Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31229Jim Rader2004-02-24Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31230elmeras20002004-02-25[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31243enlil@...2004-02-26Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31244elmeras20002004-02-26[tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31245elmeras20002004-02-27Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31246tgpedersen2004-02-27Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31258tgpedersen2004-02-28[tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31259P&G2004-02-28Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31260P&G2004-02-28Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31261P&G2004-02-28Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31263elmeras20002004-02-28[tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31264elmeras20002004-02-28[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31271Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-02-29Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31286enlil@...2004-02-29Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31292enlil@...2004-02-29Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31295Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-01Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31304P&G2004-03-01Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31307elmeras20002004-03-01[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31311P&G2004-03-01Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31318Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-02Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31319Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-02Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31322P&G2004-03-02Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31323elmeras20002004-03-02[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31343enlil@...2004-03-03Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31346P&G2004-03-03Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31347P&G2004-03-03Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31350Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-03Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31351Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-03Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31357elmeras20002004-03-03[tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31358P&G2004-03-04Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31359P&G2004-03-04Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31361enlil@...2004-03-04Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31362enlil@...2004-03-04Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31363enlil@...2004-03-04New views on Syncope
31364elmeras20002004-03-04[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31365elmeras20002004-03-04Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31366enlil@...2004-03-04Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31368P&G2004-03-05Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31370nathrao2004-03-05[tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31372Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-05Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses
31376enlil@...2004-03-05IE subjunctive
31379Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-06Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal
31380elmeras20002004-03-07Re: IE subjunctive
31381Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-07Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31382enlil@...2004-03-07Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31383enlil@...2004-03-07Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31384Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-07Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31385elmeras20002004-03-07[tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31386Sergejus Tarasovas2004-03-07[tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31387Miguel Carrasquer2004-03-07Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31407enlil@...2004-03-11Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive
31419enlil@...2004-03-12Syncope
31420Richard Wordingham2004-03-12Re: Syncope
31422enlil@...2004-03-12Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31424elmeras20002004-03-13[tied] Re: Syncope
31425elmeras20002004-03-13Re: Syncope
31429elmeras20002004-03-13Re: Syncope
31453enlil@...2004-03-16Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31454enlil@...2004-03-16Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31457elmeras20002004-03-17[tied] Re: Syncope
31485enlil@...2004-03-20Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31486enlil@...2004-03-20Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31487enlil@...2004-03-20Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31498Richard Wordingham2004-03-21[tied] Re: Syncope
31499enlil@...2004-03-21Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31522Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-22Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31529enlil@...2004-03-24*ANTE*-penultimate accent in Mid IE?
31530enlil@...2004-03-24Re: [tied] *ANTE*-penultimate accent in Mid IE?
31531enlil@...2004-03-24Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31539Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-24Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31542enlil@...2004-03-25Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31543enlil@...2004-03-25Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31544Richard Wordingham2004-03-25Re: Syncope
31548Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-25Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31553elmeras20002004-03-25[tied] Re: Syncope
31554elmeras20002004-03-25[tied] Re: Syncope
31555Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-26Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31558enlil@...2004-03-26Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31559enlil@...2004-03-26Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31560enlil@...2004-03-26Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31562tgpedersen2004-03-26[tied] Re: Syncope
31563tgpedersen2004-03-26[tied] Re: Syncope
31567elmeras20002004-03-26[tied] Re: Syncope
31568Richard Wordingham2004-03-26?VCC- (was: Syncope)
31570Piotr Gasiorowski2004-03-26Re: [tied] ?VCC-
31572elmeras20002004-03-26Re: ?VCC- (was: Syncope)
31573Richard Wordingham2004-03-26Re: [tied] ?VCC-
31574Piotr Gasiorowski2004-03-26Re: [tied] ?VCC-
31575elmeras20002004-03-27[tied] Re: Syncope
31576elmeras20002004-03-27[tied] Re: Syncope
31586enlil@...2004-03-28Re: [tied] ?VCC- (was: Syncope)
31587enlil@...2004-03-28Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31588enlil@...2004-03-28Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31589enlil@...2004-03-28Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31590enlil@...2004-03-28Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31591enlil@...2004-03-28Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31592elmeras20002004-03-28[tied] Re: Syncope
31593elmeras20002004-03-28[tied] Re: Syncope
31594elmeras20002004-03-28[tied] Re: Syncope
31595Richard Wordingham2004-03-28Re: Syncope
31596elmeras20002004-03-29[tied] Re: Syncope
31597Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-29Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31604Abdullah Konushevci2004-03-30Re: Syncope
31608Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-30Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31612enlil@...2004-03-30Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31613enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31614enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31615enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31616Brian M. Scott2004-03-31Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31617enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31618enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31619enlil@...2004-03-31Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31620Brian M. Scott2004-03-31Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31621Abdullah Konushevci2004-03-31Re: Syncope
31622Abdullah Konushevci2004-03-31Re: Syncope
31623enlil@...2004-03-31Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31624Brian M. Scott2004-03-31Re[4]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31625enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31626altamix2004-03-31Re: Syncope
31627(no author)2004-03-31(no subject)
31628Richard Wordingham2004-03-31Correcting Incidental Errors (was: Syncope)
31629Richard Wordingham2004-03-31[tied] Re: Syncope
31630Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31631Brian M. Scott2004-03-31Re[6]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31633Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31634Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31635Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31636Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31637Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-03-31Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31639P&G2004-03-31Re: Re[4]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31640enlil@...2004-03-31Re: Re[6]: [tied] Re: Syncope
31641enlil@...2004-03-31Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31642elmeras20002004-03-31Re: Syncope
31643elmeras20002004-04-01[tied] Re: Syncope
31644enlil@...2004-04-01Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31645elmeras20002004-04-01Re: Syncope
31646elmeras20002004-04-01[tied] Re: Syncope
31654P&G2004-04-01Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31681Exu Yangi2004-04-02Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31724enlil@...2004-04-06Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31726enlil@...2004-04-06Re: [tied] Correcting Incidental Errors (was: Syncope)
31728enlil@...2004-04-06Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31729enlil@...2004-04-06Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31731enlil@...2004-04-06Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31733Richard Wordingham2004-04-06[tied] Re: Syncope
31734Richard Wordingham2004-04-06[tied] Re: Syncope
31793enlil@...2004-04-08Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31794enlil@...2004-04-08Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31795enlil@...2004-04-08The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31796enlil@...2004-04-08Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31801Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-08Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31808enlil@...2004-04-09Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31811Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-09Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31816elmeras20002004-04-09[tied] Re: Syncope
31817Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-09Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31821elmeras20002004-04-09[tied] Re: Syncope
31822elmeras20002004-04-09[tied] Re: Syncope
31839enlil@...2004-04-11Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31841enlil@...2004-04-11Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31842enlil@...2004-04-11Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31843enlil@...2004-04-11Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31844enlil@...2004-04-11Re: [tied] Re: Syncope
31845elmeras20002004-04-11[tied] Re: Syncope
31846elmeras20002004-04-11Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31850Brian M. Scott2004-04-11Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31852enlil@...2004-04-11Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31853enlil@...2004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31854(no author)2004-04-12(no subject)
31856enlil@...2004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31857elmeras20002004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31859enlil@...2004-04-12Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31860enlil@...2004-04-12Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31862elmeras20002004-04-12Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31863Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-12Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31864Richard Wordingham2004-04-12Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31865elmeras20002004-04-12Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31866Brian M. Scott2004-04-12Re[4]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31877Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31878Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-12Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31879Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31881elmeras20002004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31883Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-12Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31884Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31885Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31886Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31887elmeras20002004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31888elmeras20002004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31893tgpedersen2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31894Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31895Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31896Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31898Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31901Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31903P&G2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31906elmeras20002004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31907Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31909Mate Kapovic2004-04-13Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31910elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31911elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31914Mate Kapovic2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31917Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31918Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31922elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31923elmeras20002004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31925Mate Kapovic2004-04-14Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31929elmeras20002004-04-15Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31933enlil@...2004-04-15Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31934enlil@...2004-04-15Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31935enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31936elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31937elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31938enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31939elmeras20002004-04-16[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31940enlil@...2004-04-16Re: Re[4]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31941enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31942enlil@...2004-04-16Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31943enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31944enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31945enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31946enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31947Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31948Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31949Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31950Brian M. Scott2004-04-16Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31951enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31952enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31953enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31954enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31955enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31956enlil@...2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31961tgpedersen2004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31963elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31964elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31965elmeras20002004-04-16Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31968elmeras20002004-04-16[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31970Richard Wordingham2004-04-16Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31972Richard Wordingham2004-04-16[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31973elmeras20002004-04-17[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31976elmeras20002004-04-17[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31977Harald Hammarstrom2004-04-17Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31979Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-17Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31982enlil@...2004-04-17Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31983enlil@...2004-04-17Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
31984elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31985Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31986enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31987enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31988enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31989enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31990enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31991enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31992enlil@...2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31993P&G2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31995elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31996elmeras20002004-04-18Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31997elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
31999Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32000Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32001Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarification
32002Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32003Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarificat
32004Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-18Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32005elmeras20002004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32006Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarification
32007Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-18Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32008Richard Wordingham2004-04-18[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32009elmeras20002004-04-19Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32010Richard Wordingham2004-04-19Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32011Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32012P&G2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32013P&G2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32017Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32018P&G2004-04-19Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32019enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32021enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32022enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32023elmeras20002004-04-19Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32024enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32025enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32026elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32027enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32028elmeras20002004-04-19Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32029elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32030elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32031elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32032Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32033Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32034elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32035elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32036Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32039Mate Kapović2004-04-19Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32041Richard Wordingham2004-04-19-osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32042Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32043enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32044enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32045enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32046enlil@...2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32047Richard Wordingham2004-04-19Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32048elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32049elmeras20002004-04-19Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32050Mate Kapović2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32051Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32052Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32053Brian M. Scott2004-04-19Re[2]: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32054Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-19Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32055Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32056elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32057Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32058elmeras20002004-04-19Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32059Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32060elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32061Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32062elmeras20002004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32063Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-19[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32064elmeras20002004-04-19Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32065Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32066Mate Kapovic2004-04-19Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32067elmeras20002004-04-19Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32068Mate Kapovic2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32069Mate Kapovic2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32070Mate Kapovic2004-04-20Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32071Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-20Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32072enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32073enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32074enlil@...2004-04-20Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32075enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32076enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32077Richard Wordingham2004-04-20Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32078Richard Wordingham2004-04-20Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss. A strength
32079Richard Wordingham2004-04-20-osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32081enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32082Richard Wordingham2004-04-20[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32083enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss.
32084enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32085Richard Wordingham2004-04-20[tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32086enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32087enlil@...2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32088Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32089Richard Wordingham2004-04-20Re: Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss. A stre
32090Richard Wordingham2004-04-20[tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32093tgpedersen2004-04-20Re: The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32096elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32097elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32098elmeras20002004-04-20Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32099elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32100elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32102elmeras20002004-04-20Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32103elmeras20002004-04-20Re: [tied] Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss.
32104Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32105elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32106elmeras20002004-04-20Re: [tied] -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32107elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32108Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32109Brian M. Scott2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32111elmeras20002004-04-20[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32112Mate Kapovic2004-04-20Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32113Mate Kapovic2004-04-20Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32114Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32115Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32116Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32119Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32120Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32121Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32123Richard Wordingham2004-04-21Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32124Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32125Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32126Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32127Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32128Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32129Richard Wordingham2004-04-21Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32130Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32131Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32132Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32133Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32134Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32135Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32136Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32137Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32138Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32139Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32140Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32141Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32142Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32144Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32145Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32146Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32147Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32148Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32149Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32150Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32151Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32152Richard Wordingham2004-04-21Slavic _stryjI_ 'Uncle' (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theor
32153Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32154Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32155elmeras20002004-04-21Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32156elmeras20002004-04-21[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32157elmeras20002004-04-21[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32158Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32159Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-21[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32160Mate Kapovic2004-04-21Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32162Mate Kapovic2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32163enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32164Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32165enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32166enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32167enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32168enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32169Richard Wordingham2004-04-22-osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32170enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32171enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32172enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32173Harald Hammarstrom2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues
32174enlil@...2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32175Richard Wordingham2004-04-22Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32176Richard Wordingham2004-04-22*nepot- Nephew (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32177Richard Wordingham2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32181Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32182Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32184Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-22Re: [tied] Quirky Slavic endings (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthe
32185Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-22Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32186Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32187Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-22Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32188Brian M. Scott2004-04-22Re[2]: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32190Mate Kapović2004-04-22Re: [tied] Quirky Slavic endings (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthe
32193elmeras20002004-04-22[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32195elmeras20002004-04-22[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32196elmeras20002004-04-22[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32197elmeras20002004-04-22[tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32198elmeras20002004-04-23Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32200Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-23*-o:y in Lithuanian (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32212enlil@...2004-04-23Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32213enlil@...2004-04-23Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32214enlil@...2004-04-23Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32215enlil@...2004-04-23Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32216elmeras20002004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32217Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32219Mate Kapovic2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32220elmeras20002004-04-24[tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32221Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line
32223elmeras20002004-04-24[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32224Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32227Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32228enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32229Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32230Brian M. Scott2004-04-24Re[2]: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32232enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32233Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32234enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32235enlil@...2004-04-24Re: Re[2]: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened the
32236enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32237P&G2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32238enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32239Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32240Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32241enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32242enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32243P&G2004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32244Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32245Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32246Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32247enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32248Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-24Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line
32249enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory
32250Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32252enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32253enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32254Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32256Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32257enlil@...2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32258Richard Wordingham2004-04-24French Vowel Length (was: -osyo 4)
32259tgpedersen2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32260Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32261tgpedersen2004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32262Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: French Vowel Length (was: -osyo 4)
32264elmeras20002004-04-24Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32265elmeras20002004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32266Exu Yangi2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32267Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-24[tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules
32268elmeras20002004-04-24Re: [tied] Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32272Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32274Richard Wordingham2004-04-24Re: Rise of the Feminine - Correction
32276Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-24Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32277Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32281Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-24Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line
32283Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32284elmeras20002004-04-24Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32286Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] French Vowel Length (was: -osyo 4)
32287Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32288Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-24Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32289elmeras20002004-04-24Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32291elmeras20002004-04-25Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32293Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32294Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32296enlil@...2004-04-25Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32298Richard Wordingham2004-04-25Re: [tied] French Vowel Length
32299P&G2004-04-25Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32300Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-25Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32301Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] French Vowel Length
32302elmeras20002004-04-25Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32303elmeras20002004-04-25Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32304elmeras20002004-04-25[tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32305Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-25[tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules
32307Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32308Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32309Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32311elmeras20002004-04-25[tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32312Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-25Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line
32313Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-25Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32314Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-26Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32315P&G2004-04-26Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32316Abdullah Konushevci2004-04-26[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
32317Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-26Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32318Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-26Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32319Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-26Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32320Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-26Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line
32321Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-26Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32322enlil@...2004-04-26Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32323Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-26Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line
32324enlil@...2004-04-27Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32325enlil@...2004-04-27Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32326Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32327enlil@...2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32328enlil@...2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32329enlil@...2004-04-27Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32330Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32331P&G2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32332Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32333Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32334Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32335Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32338elmeras20002004-04-27Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32339elmeras20002004-04-27[tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32340Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-27Re: [tied] PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4]
32342elmeras20002004-04-27[tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32343Richard Wordingham2004-04-27[tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine
32344elmeras20002004-04-27[tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules
32345Richard Wordingham2004-04-27[tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine
32346elmeras20002004-04-27Re: [tied] PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4]
32348enlil@...2004-04-28Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32349Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32351enlil@...2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32352enlil@...2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32353Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32355Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32356Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32357Richard Wordingham2004-04-28Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32358Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32359Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32360Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-28Re: [tied] PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4]
32361Richard Wordingham2004-04-28Re: PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4]
32362Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32363enlil@...2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32364Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32365enlil@...2004-04-28Re: [tied] Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32366Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32367Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32368Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32369Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32370Richard Wordingham2004-04-28Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32372Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32373Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32374Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32375Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32376Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32377Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-28[tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules
32378Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32379Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr
32380Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32381Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules
32383Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32384Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32385Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32386Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32387Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32388Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32389Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32390Sergejus Tarasovas2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine
32392Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3)
32394Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32395alex2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32396Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32397alex2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32398Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32399alex2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32400Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32401Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32403Richard Wordingham2004-04-29[tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32404alex2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32405Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32406Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32410elmeras20002004-04-29Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?)
32411elmeras20002004-04-29[tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules
32413elmeras20002004-04-29Re: [tied] Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32414Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-29Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32415Richard Wordingham2004-04-30Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32417Miguel Carrasquer2004-04-30Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32419Anders R. Jørgensen2004-04-30Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32420Piotr Gasiorowski2004-04-30Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine]
32421enlil@...2004-04-30Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32422Richard Wordingham2004-04-30Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32427elmeras20002004-05-01Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32430enlil@...2004-05-01Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32432enlil@...2004-05-01Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32438Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ2004-05-01Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32439Richard Wordingham2004-05-02[tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32441Harald Hammarstrom2004-05-02Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32443Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ2004-05-02Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32445Anthony Appleyard2004-05-02[tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32446Anthony Appleyard2004-05-02[tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32472Exu Yangi2004-05-05Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)
32473enlil@...2004-05-06The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32489Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-05-07Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32608enlil@...2004-05-14Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32613elmeras20002004-05-14Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32614elmeras20002004-05-15Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32624enlil@...2004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32625enlil@...2004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32632elmeras20002004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32634enlil@...2004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32639elmeras20002004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32644Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32649elmeras20002004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32654Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32658Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-16Re: [tied] whatever
32660elmeras20002004-05-16Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32663Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-17Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32669tgpedersen2004-05-17Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32670tgpedersen2004-05-17Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32690enlil@...2004-05-18Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32696Richard Wordingham2004-05-18Genitive/Thematioc confusion: The Rise of Feminines
32710enlil@...2004-05-18Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32715enlil@...2004-05-18Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematioc confusion: The Rise of Feminines
32725Richard Wordingham2004-05-18Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32726elmeras20002004-05-18Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32728elmeras20002004-05-18Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo)
32741enlil@...2004-05-19Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32755Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-19Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32768Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-05-19Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32772Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-19Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32797elmeras20002004-05-20Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32805Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-20Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32808elmeras20002004-05-20Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32810elmeras20002004-05-20Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)
32816Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-20Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines)