Number | Author | Date | Title |
30978 | Brent J. Ermlick | 2004-02-12 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
30995 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-02-12 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31026 | P&G | 2004-02-13 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31037 | enlil@... | 2004-02-14 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31053 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-14 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31094 | P&G | 2004-02-15 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31104 | enlil@... | 2004-02-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31114 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-16 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31117 | tgpedersen | 2004-02-16 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31119 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-16 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31135 | P&G | 2004-02-17 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31148 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-02-17 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31149 | Marco Moretti | 2004-02-17 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31165 | P&G | 2004-02-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31167 | enlil@... | 2004-02-18 | a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31171 | enlil@... | 2004-02-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31174 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-19 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31175 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-19 | Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31184 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-02-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31186 | P&G | 2004-02-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31188 | P&G | 2004-02-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31194 | enlil@... | 2004-02-20 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31195 | P&G | 2004-02-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31197 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-20 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31199 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-21 | Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31201 | P&G | 2004-02-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31202 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-02-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31203 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-21 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31206 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-02-22 | Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31207 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-22 | Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31214 | enlil@... | 2004-02-23 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31216 | enlil@... | 2004-02-23 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31220 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-23 | [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31226 | P&G | 2004-02-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31227 | P&G | 2004-02-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31229 | Jim Rader | 2004-02-24 | Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31230 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-25 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31243 | enlil@... | 2004-02-26 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31244 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-26 | [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31245 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-27 | Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31246 | tgpedersen | 2004-02-27 | Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31258 | tgpedersen | 2004-02-28 | [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31259 | P&G | 2004-02-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31260 | P&G | 2004-02-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31261 | P&G | 2004-02-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31263 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-28 | [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31264 | elmeras2000 | 2004-02-28 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31271 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-02-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31286 | enlil@... | 2004-02-29 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31292 | enlil@... | 2004-02-29 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31295 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-01 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31304 | P&G | 2004-03-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31307 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-01 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31311 | P&G | 2004-03-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31318 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-02 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31319 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-02 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31322 | P&G | 2004-03-02 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31323 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-02 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31343 | enlil@... | 2004-03-03 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31346 | P&G | 2004-03-03 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31347 | P&G | 2004-03-03 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31350 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-03 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31351 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-03 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31357 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-03 | [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31358 | P&G | 2004-03-04 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31359 | P&G | 2004-03-04 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31361 | enlil@... | 2004-03-04 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31362 | enlil@... | 2004-03-04 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31363 | enlil@... | 2004-03-04 | New views on Syncope |
31364 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-04 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31365 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-04 | Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31366 | enlil@... | 2004-03-04 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31368 | P&G | 2004-03-05 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31370 | nathrao | 2004-03-05 | [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31372 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-05 | Re: [tied] Re: Eggs from birds and swift horses |
31376 | enlil@... | 2004-03-05 | IE subjunctive |
31379 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-06 | Re: [tied] Re: a-Epenthesis: This time its personal |
31380 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-07 | Re: IE subjunctive |
31381 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-07 | Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31382 | enlil@... | 2004-03-07 | Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31383 | enlil@... | 2004-03-07 | Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31384 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-07 | Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31385 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-07 | [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31386 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-03-07 | [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31387 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-03-07 | Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31407 | enlil@... | 2004-03-11 | Re: [tied] Re: IE subjunctive |
31419 | enlil@... | 2004-03-12 | Syncope |
31420 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-12 | Re: Syncope |
31422 | enlil@... | 2004-03-12 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31424 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-13 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31425 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-13 | Re: Syncope |
31429 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-13 | Re: Syncope |
31453 | enlil@... | 2004-03-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31454 | enlil@... | 2004-03-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31457 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-17 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31485 | enlil@... | 2004-03-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31486 | enlil@... | 2004-03-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31487 | enlil@... | 2004-03-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31498 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-21 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31499 | enlil@... | 2004-03-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31522 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31529 | enlil@... | 2004-03-24 | *ANTE*-penultimate accent in Mid IE? |
31530 | enlil@... | 2004-03-24 | Re: [tied] *ANTE*-penultimate accent in Mid IE? |
31531 | enlil@... | 2004-03-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31539 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31542 | enlil@... | 2004-03-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31543 | enlil@... | 2004-03-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31544 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-25 | Re: Syncope |
31548 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31553 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-25 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31554 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-25 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31555 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31558 | enlil@... | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31559 | enlil@... | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31560 | enlil@... | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31562 | tgpedersen | 2004-03-26 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31563 | tgpedersen | 2004-03-26 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31567 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-26 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31568 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-26 | ?VCC- (was: Syncope) |
31570 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] ?VCC- |
31572 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-26 | Re: ?VCC- (was: Syncope) |
31573 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] ?VCC- |
31574 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-03-26 | Re: [tied] ?VCC- |
31575 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-27 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31576 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-27 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31586 | enlil@... | 2004-03-28 | Re: [tied] ?VCC- (was: Syncope) |
31587 | enlil@... | 2004-03-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31588 | enlil@... | 2004-03-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31589 | enlil@... | 2004-03-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31590 | enlil@... | 2004-03-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31591 | enlil@... | 2004-03-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31592 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-28 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31593 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-28 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31594 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-28 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31595 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-28 | Re: Syncope |
31596 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-29 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31597 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31604 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-03-30 | Re: Syncope |
31608 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-30 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31612 | enlil@... | 2004-03-30 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31613 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31614 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31615 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31616 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-03-31 | Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31617 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31618 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31619 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31620 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-03-31 | Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31621 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-03-31 | Re: Syncope |
31622 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-03-31 | Re: Syncope |
31623 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31624 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-03-31 | Re[4]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31625 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31626 | altamix | 2004-03-31 | Re: Syncope |
31627 | (no author) | 2004-03-31 | (no subject) |
31628 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-31 | Correcting Incidental Errors (was: Syncope) |
31629 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-03-31 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31630 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31631 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-03-31 | Re[6]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31633 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31634 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31635 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31636 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31637 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-03-31 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31639 | P&G | 2004-03-31 | Re: Re[4]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31640 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: Re[6]: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31641 | enlil@... | 2004-03-31 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31642 | elmeras2000 | 2004-03-31 | Re: Syncope |
31643 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-01 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31644 | enlil@... | 2004-04-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31645 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-01 | Re: Syncope |
31646 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-01 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31654 | P&G | 2004-04-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31681 | Exu Yangi | 2004-04-02 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31724 | enlil@... | 2004-04-06 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31726 | enlil@... | 2004-04-06 | Re: [tied] Correcting Incidental Errors (was: Syncope) |
31728 | enlil@... | 2004-04-06 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31729 | enlil@... | 2004-04-06 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31731 | enlil@... | 2004-04-06 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31733 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-06 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31734 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-06 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31793 | enlil@... | 2004-04-08 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31794 | enlil@... | 2004-04-08 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31795 | enlil@... | 2004-04-08 | The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31796 | enlil@... | 2004-04-08 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31801 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-08 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31808 | enlil@... | 2004-04-09 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31811 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-09 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31816 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-09 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31817 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-09 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31821 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-09 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31822 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-09 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31839 | enlil@... | 2004-04-11 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31841 | enlil@... | 2004-04-11 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31842 | enlil@... | 2004-04-11 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31843 | enlil@... | 2004-04-11 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31844 | enlil@... | 2004-04-11 | Re: [tied] Re: Syncope |
31845 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-11 | [tied] Re: Syncope |
31846 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-11 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31850 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-11 | Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31852 | enlil@... | 2004-04-11 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31853 | enlil@... | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31854 | (no author) | 2004-04-12 | (no subject) |
31856 | enlil@... | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31857 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31859 | enlil@... | 2004-04-12 | Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31860 | enlil@... | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31862 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31863 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31864 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-12 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31865 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-12 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31866 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-12 | Re[4]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31877 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31878 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-12 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31879 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31881 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31883 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-12 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31884 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31885 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31886 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31887 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31888 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31893 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31894 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31895 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31896 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31898 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31901 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31903 | P&G | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31906 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31907 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31909 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31910 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31911 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31914 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31917 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31918 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31922 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31923 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31925 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31929 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31933 | enlil@... | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31934 | enlil@... | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31935 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31936 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31937 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31938 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31939 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31940 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: Re[4]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31941 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31942 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31943 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31944 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31945 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31946 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31947 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31948 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31949 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31950 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-16 | Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31951 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31952 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31953 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31954 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31955 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31956 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31961 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31963 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31964 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31965 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31968 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31970 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-16 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31972 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31973 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-17 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31976 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-17 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31977 | Harald Hammarstrom | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31979 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31982 | enlil@... | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31983 | enlil@... | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31984 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31985 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31986 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31987 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31988 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31989 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31990 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31991 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31992 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31993 | P&G | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31995 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31996 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31997 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31999 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32000 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32001 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarification |
32002 | Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32003 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarificat |
32004 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32005 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32006 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarification |
32007 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32008 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32009 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32010 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-19 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32011 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32012 | P&G | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32013 | P&G | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32017 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32018 | P&G | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32019 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32021 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32022 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32023 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32024 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32025 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32026 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32027 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32028 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32029 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32030 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32031 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32032 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32033 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32034 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32035 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32036 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32039 | Mate Kapović | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32041 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-19 | -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32042 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32043 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32044 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32045 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32046 | enlil@... | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32047 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-19 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32048 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32049 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32050 | Mate Kapović | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32051 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32052 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32053 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-19 | Re[2]: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32054 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-19 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32055 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32056 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32057 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32058 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32059 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32060 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32061 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32062 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32063 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-19 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32064 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32065 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32066 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32067 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-19 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32068 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32069 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32070 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32071 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32072 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32073 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32074 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32075 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32076 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32077 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32078 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss. A strength |
32079 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32081 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32082 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32083 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss. |
32084 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32085 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32086 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32087 | enlil@... | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32088 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32089 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | Re: Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss. A stre |
32090 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32093 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-20 | Re: The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32096 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32097 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32098 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32099 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32100 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32102 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32103 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Erosion of Latin -us into Romance (was: Nominative Loss. |
32104 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32105 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32106 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32107 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32108 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32109 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32111 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-20 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32112 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32113 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-20 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32114 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32115 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32116 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32119 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32120 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32121 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32123 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-21 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32124 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32125 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32126 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32127 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32128 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32129 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-21 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32130 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32131 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32132 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32133 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32134 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32135 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32136 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32137 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32138 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32139 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32140 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32141 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32142 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32144 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32145 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32146 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32147 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32148 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32149 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32150 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32151 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32152 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-21 | Slavic _stryjI_ 'Uncle' (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theor |
32153 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32154 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32155 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32156 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-21 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32157 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-21 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32158 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32159 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-21 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32160 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-21 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32162 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32163 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32164 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32165 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32166 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32167 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32168 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32169 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-22 | -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32170 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32171 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32172 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32173 | Harald Hammarstrom | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
32174 | enlil@... | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32175 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-22 | Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32176 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-22 | *nepot- Nephew (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32177 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32181 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32182 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32184 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Quirky Slavic endings (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthe |
32185 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32186 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32187 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32188 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-22 | Re[2]: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32190 | Mate Kapović | 2004-04-22 | Re: [tied] Quirky Slavic endings (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthe |
32193 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-22 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32195 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-22 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32196 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-22 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32197 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-22 | [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32198 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-23 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32200 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-23 | *-o:y in Lithuanian (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32212 | enlil@... | 2004-04-23 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32213 | enlil@... | 2004-04-23 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32214 | enlil@... | 2004-04-23 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32215 | enlil@... | 2004-04-23 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32216 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32217 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32219 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32220 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | [tied] Re: -osyo 3 (Was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32221 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line |
32223 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32224 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32227 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32228 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32229 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32230 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-24 | Re[2]: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32232 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32233 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32234 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32235 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened the |
32236 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32237 | P&G | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32238 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32239 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32240 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32241 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32242 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32243 | P&G | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32244 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32245 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32246 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32247 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32248 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-24 | Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line |
32249 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory |
32250 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32252 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32253 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32254 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32256 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32257 | enlil@... | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32258 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | French Vowel Length (was: -osyo 4) |
32259 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32260 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32261 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32262 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: French Vowel Length (was: -osyo 4) |
32264 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32265 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32266 | Exu Yangi | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32267 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-24 | [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules |
32268 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32272 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32274 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-24 | Re: Rise of the Feminine - Correction |
32276 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32277 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32281 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-24 | Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line |
32283 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32284 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32286 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] French Vowel Length (was: -osyo 4) |
32287 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32288 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32289 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-24 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32291 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32293 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32294 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32296 | enlil@... | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32298 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] French Vowel Length |
32299 | P&G | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32300 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32301 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] French Vowel Length |
32302 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32303 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32304 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-25 | [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32305 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-25 | [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules |
32307 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32308 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32309 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32311 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-25 | [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32312 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-25 | Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line |
32313 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-25 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32314 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32315 | P&G | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32316 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-04-26 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
32317 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32318 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32319 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32320 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-26 | Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line |
32321 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32322 | enlil@... | 2004-04-26 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32323 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-26 | Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules on-line |
32324 | enlil@... | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32325 | enlil@... | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32326 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32327 | enlil@... | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32328 | enlil@... | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32329 | enlil@... | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32330 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32331 | P&G | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32332 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32333 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32334 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32335 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32338 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32339 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-27 | [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32340 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4] |
32342 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-27 | [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32343 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-27 | [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine |
32344 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-27 | [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules |
32345 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-27 | [tied] Re: Rise of the Feminine |
32346 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-27 | Re: [tied] PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4] |
32348 | enlil@... | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32349 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32351 | enlil@... | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32352 | enlil@... | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32353 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32355 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32356 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32357 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-28 | Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32358 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32359 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32360 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4] |
32361 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-28 | Re: PIE *c ? [Was: -osyo 4] |
32362 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32363 | enlil@... | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32364 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32365 | enlil@... | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32366 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32367 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32368 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32369 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32370 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-28 | Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32372 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32373 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32374 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32375 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32376 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32377 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-28 | [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules |
32378 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32379 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundr |
32380 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-28 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32381 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules |
32383 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32384 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32385 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32386 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32387 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32388 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32389 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32390 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine |
32392 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Re: Risoe fo the Feminine (was: -osyo 3) |
32394 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32395 | alex | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32396 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32397 | alex | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32398 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32399 | alex | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32400 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32401 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32403 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-29 | [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32404 | alex | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32405 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32406 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Birdo [was Re: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32410 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] -osyo 4 (was: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?) |
32411 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-29 | [tied] Re: Decircumflexion, N-raising, H-raising: Slavic soundrules |
32413 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32414 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-29 | Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32415 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-30 | Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32417 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-30 | Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32419 | Anders R. Jørgensen | 2004-04-30 | Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32420 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-30 | Re: [tied] Brittonic duck [was: Risoe fo the Feminine] |
32421 | enlil@... | 2004-04-30 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32422 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-30 | Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32427 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-01 | Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32430 | enlil@... | 2004-05-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32432 | enlil@... | 2004-05-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32438 | Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ | 2004-05-01 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32439 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-05-02 | [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32441 | Harald Hammarstrom | 2004-05-02 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32443 | Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ | 2004-05-02 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32445 | Anthony Appleyard | 2004-05-02 | [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32446 | Anthony Appleyard | 2004-05-02 | [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32472 | Exu Yangi | 2004-05-05 | Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine) |
32473 | enlil@... | 2004-05-06 | The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32489 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-05-07 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32608 | enlil@... | 2004-05-14 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32613 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-14 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32614 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-15 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32624 | enlil@... | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32625 | enlil@... | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32632 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32634 | enlil@... | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32639 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32644 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32649 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32654 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32658 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] whatever |
32660 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-16 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32663 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-17 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32669 | tgpedersen | 2004-05-17 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32670 | tgpedersen | 2004-05-17 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32690 | enlil@... | 2004-05-18 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32696 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-05-18 | Genitive/Thematioc confusion: The Rise of Feminines |
32710 | enlil@... | 2004-05-18 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32715 | enlil@... | 2004-05-18 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematioc confusion: The Rise of Feminines |
32725 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-05-18 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32726 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-18 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32728 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-18 | Re: [tied] The Rise of Feminines (aka Where's Waldo) |
32741 | enlil@... | 2004-05-19 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32755 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-19 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32768 | Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen | 2004-05-19 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32772 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-19 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32797 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-20 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32805 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-20 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32808 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-20 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32810 | elmeras2000 | 2004-05-20 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |
32816 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-05-20 | Re: [tied] Genitive/Thematic confusion: (was: The Rise of Feminines) |