Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

From: elmeras2000
Message: 32009
Date: 2004-04-19

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham"
<richard.wordingham@...> wrote:

[JER:]
> > "The owner of which" would be the genitive of the relative
> > pronoun which has not been brought into this yet.
>
> No, it would be an 'antigenitive', a construct state.

Yes, I'm beginning to see that, though it feels *very* awkward. And
I do not really understand that a relative pronoun could be the
thing owned by anybody or anything.

This funny thing, "antigenitive", would require to be combined with
a genitive, would it not? In that case *wlkWos- (with pronouns, *tes-
) would be a genitive. Is this right?