Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?
From: P&G Message: 32018 Date: 2004-04-19
>we do not know which variant belonged in pausa.
In Pausa is also sandhi - we cannot assume that the variant before pausa is
the base form. It is the underlying base form we should reconstruct, not
any of the phonetically conditioned variants.
Peter
Previous in thread: 32017 Next in thread: 32019 Previous message: 32017 Next message: 32019