Re: [tied] Re: Utility of Articles (was: Rise of the Feminine)

From: Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ
Message: 32438
Date: 2004-05-01

Glen:
> The usage of classifiers would appear to be an areal feature
of
> many Asian languages. I've encountered them in Vietnamese,
Mandarin,
> Cantonese and Japanese.
 
 
It is so in the sense that in the languages of Eastern and South-Eastern Asia the usage of classifiers is a very developed feature. But really, something similar is attested also in many other languages, including some IE ones. Russian examples:
 
tri s^tuki karandas^ej
three CLF (lit. "things") of-pencils
"three pencils"
 
desjat' golov ovec
ten CLF (lit. heads) of-sheep
"ten sheep"
 
sorok sabel' kavaleristov
forty CLF (lit. sables) of-cavalrymen
"forty cavalrymen"
 
The only difference is that in Russian the classifiers are not obligatory, so that the same meanings can be expressed without trhem: tri karandas^a, desjat' ovec, sorok kavaleristov. And., I think, something similar exists even in such English expressions as: two cups of coffee, five glasses of milk, etc.
 
==========
Vadim Ponaryadov