Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 32121
Date: 2004-04-21

> From: Piotr Gasiorowski [mailto:piotr.gasiorowski@...]

> *(nekWto-)pto:r > *-p(t)o:: > *-pu:

One would expect *-stu:. Or you don't accept this *pt > *st rule in Slavic?

Sergei

Previous in thread: 32120
Next in thread: 32123
Previous message: 32120
Next message: 32122