[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

From: elmeras2000
Message: 32157
Date: 2004-04-21

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Mate Kapovic" <mkapovic@...>
wrote:

> I don't see how you explain Slavic g. pl. from *-oom > *-o::m.
Slavic -7
> looks like plain PIE *-om to me.

Maybe it does, but would you also posit PIE short *-om as the
gen.pl. of *aH2-stems?

Jens