From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 32036
Date: 2004-04-19
> From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]On the other hand, one can't if he subscribes to Jens' view that the
>
> By the way, positing *-o:(:) (and not *-o:n) as the
> protoform for Lith. -uõ one can easily solve the problem of
> Lith. *o-stems gen. pl. -u:~N (if from
> *-o:m):
>
> *-o:(:) > -uõ
> *-o:m > *-uom > -u:~N (Meillet's solution, if I'm not
> mistaken). No need for Kortlandt's sophistry.
>