Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, enlil@... wrote:

> Again, simple. It's just not true that any *s causes lengthening.
> This rule isn't dependent on phonetics. It's dependent on
> morphophonology.

How very true. That, however, is the same thing, only more
complicated, and therefore more correct.

Jens