Number | Author | Date | Title |
Earlier messages |
31900 | Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] Demonstratives |
31901 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31902 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] Demonstratives |
31903 | P&G | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31904 | P&G | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] Demonstratives |
31905 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] Arminius/Hermann |
31906 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31907 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31908 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] Acc. plural of o- and eh2-stems (was: The disappearanceo |
31909 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-13 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31910 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31911 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31912 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Arminius/Hermann |
31913 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Arminius/Hermann |
31914 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31915 | loreto bagio | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Santiago and James |
31916 | loreto bagio | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Santiago and James |
31917 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31918 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31919 | Pere | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Santiago and James |
31920 | P&G | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Santiago and James |
31921 | g | 2004-04-14 | Re: Santiago and James |
31922 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31923 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31924 | Joao | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] Santiago and James |
31925 | Mate Kapovic | 2004-04-14 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31926 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-15 | Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31927 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-15 | Re: Whence Grimm? |
31928 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31929 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31930 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Acc. plural of o- and eh2-stems (was: The disappearanceo |
31931 | george knysh | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?] |
31932 | P&G | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Re: Santiago and James |
31933 | enlil@... | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31934 | enlil@... | 2004-04-15 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31935 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31936 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31937 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31938 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31939 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31940 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: Re[4]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31941 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31942 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31943 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31944 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31945 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31946 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31947 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31948 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31949 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31950 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-16 | Re[2]: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31951 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31952 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31953 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31954 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31955 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31956 | enlil@... | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31957 | Alvin Ekmekciu | 2004-04-16 | Re: Romanian-Albanian (a) |
31958 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-04-16 | Re: Romanian-Albanian (a) |
31959 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-16 | Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?] |
31960 | g | 2004-04-16 | Re: Romanian-Albanian (a) |
31961 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31962 | tgpedersen | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31963 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31964 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31965 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31966 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-04-16 | Re: Romanian-Albanian (a) |
31967 | george knysh | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?] |
31968 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31969 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-16 | Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31970 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-16 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31971 | Joao | 2004-04-16 | German TH, |
31972 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-16 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31973 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-17 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31974 | george knysh | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] Snorri on "Odin's journey" [Was:Re: Whence Grimm?] |
31975 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] German TH, |
31976 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-17 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31977 | Harald Hammarstrom | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31978 | ND | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31979 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31980 | Brian M. Scott | 2004-04-17 | Re[2]: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31981 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31982 | enlil@... | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31983 | enlil@... | 2004-04-17 | Re: [tied] The disappearance of *-s -- The saga continues |
31984 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31985 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31986 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31987 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31988 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31989 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31990 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31991 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31992 | enlil@... | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31993 | P&G | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31994 | P&G | 2004-04-18 | Re: [tied] German TH, |
31995 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31996 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31997 | elmeras2000 | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
31998 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2004-04-18 | Re: Arminius/Hermann |
31999 | Richard Wordingham | 2004-04-18 | [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? |
Later messages |