Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

From: enlil@...
Message: 31989
Date: 2004-04-18

Jens:
> Thank you Miguel, but do you really think this is good for our
> mutual friend's blood pressure?

Why would one's blood pressure rise from idle conjecture? Between
Miguel frantically rewriting Anatolian while bravely but foolishly
opposing consensus and Jens predicting case forms that don't exist
based on his false etymology of *-syo, I'm having a good laugh.

At least my idea doesn't force me to rewrite IE. Yo'll have fun.


= gLeN

Previous in thread: 31988
Next in thread: 31990
Previous message: 31988
Next message: 31990

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts