[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

From: Sergejus Tarasovas
Message: 32151
Date: 2004-04-21

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
<piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:

> PS But why *h2 and *nep-t- rather than just *nept-?

I don't know. As to the h2, he probably interprets Gr. <anepsiĆ³s>,
<anepsiĆ”> '(male, female) cousin' as *h2nept-i- rather than *sm.-nept-
i-.

Sergei