Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergejus Tarasovas" <S.Tarasovas@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?


> > From: Piotr Gasiorowski [mailto:piotr.gasiorowski@...]
>
> > *(nekWto-)pto:r > *-p(t)o:: > *-pu:
>
> One would expect *-stu:. Or you don't accept this *pt > *st rule in
Slavic?

You could say it has different outcome in the middle of the word maybe?

Mate