Re: [tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory?

> From: Sergejus Tarasovas [mailto:S.Tarasovas@...]

> There seems to be no raising after *j in Sl. (*-ja::x >
> *-ja:x [-jæ:h] > *-je^ ~ *-jeN, the nasalized variant being
> analogically introduced from
> accusative?)

Cf. Lith. <maneN~s> 'me' (G.sg.), the ending being usually explained as
analogical from accusative.

Sergei