[tied] Re: Nominative Loss. A strengthened theory? - Clarification

From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 32001
Date: 2004-04-18

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham"
> Abbreviating 'is-owner-of' to 'OWN' ('DAT' is too specific to
> Chickasaw), it converts
>
> Y OWN-X-NOM
>
> to
>
> Y-NOM OWN-X-NOM

By 'it', I mean 'subject possessor raising' (SPR).

Incidentally, Y OWN-X-NOM looks a better way of motivating the
development of the PIE gentive plural *-om from the Nostratic *-b
nominal plural marker than the argument Miguel put forward in
his 'Tour of Nostratic Grammar'. Extra-PIE comments to Nostratic-L,
please.

Richard.