From: P&G
Message: 31368
Date: 2004-03-05
>Well, I think besides the normal (active) subjunctive, thereThis is more believable than a "preterite subjunctive", as it's in line with
>was also a "stative subjunctive"/"hi-conjugation
>subjunctive", .. i.e. a form with thematic vowel + the
>"perfect" endings,
>>Neat. I don't want to believe it (yet), but I admit it's neat!I am even more impressed, but have not yet signed on the dotted line.
>Perhaps my additional explanations will help to lift the
>disbelief :-)