NumberAuthorDateTitle
Earlier messages
2800Peter T. Daniels2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2801John Cowan2004-07-08Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2802John Cowan2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2803suzmccarth2004-07-08Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2804suzmccarth2004-07-08Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2805suzmccarth2004-07-08Amharic display
2806suzmccarth2004-07-08spam
2807Mark E. Shoulson2004-07-08Re: spam
2808Nicholas Bodley2004-07-08Arbitrary-seeming encoding gibberish (Was:Re: How about a typology
2809John Cowan2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2810Patrick Chew2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2811ዳንኤል ያዕá2004-07-08Arbitrary-seeming encoding gibberish (Was:Re: How about a typology
2812John Cowan2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2813Mark E. Shoulson2004-07-08Re: aleif beit
2814suzmccarth2004-07-08and how are they encoded?
2815suzmccarth2004-07-08Re: aleif beit
2816Mark E. Shoulson2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2817Stage Linguistique2004-07-08Re: Quasi-logographic
2818suzmccarth2004-07-08Re: How about a typology for input methods
2819Stage Linguistique2004-07-08Re: Quasi-logographic
2820Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2821Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2822suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: Quasi-logographic
2823Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2824Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2825Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2826Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2827Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: aleif beit
2828Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2829Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2830Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: aleif beit
2831Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2832Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: Quasi-logographic
2833suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2834suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: aleif beit
2835suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2836Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: Quasi-logographic
2837suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2838Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2839suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: Quasi-logographic
2840Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2841Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: aleif beit
2842Mark E. Shoulson2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2843Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2844suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2845Mark E. Shoulson2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2846suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2847John Cowan2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2848John Cowan2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2849John Cowan2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2850John Cowan2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2851John Cowan2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2852suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2853John Cowan2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2854suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2855Marco Cimarosti2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2856Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2857Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2858Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2859Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2860Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2861Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2862Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2863Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2864Andrew Dunbar2004-07-09Re: spam
2865sentringham2004-07-09Sign language fonts
2866John Cowan2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2867John Cowan2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2868John Cowan2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2869Marco Cimarosti2004-07-09Re: Quasi-logographic
2870Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2871Marco Cimarosti2004-07-09[OT] Mojibake (was RE: How about a typology for input methods)
2872John Cowan2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2873Seshat2004-07-09PLEASE QUOTE PROPERLY
2874suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2875suzmccarth2004-07-09Ideographic was: and how are they encoded?
2876Seshat2004-07-09Re: A Qalam Glossary
2877suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2878John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2879John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2880Marco Cimarosti2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2881John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2882John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: Ideographic was: and how are they encoded?
2883John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2884Mark E. Shoulson2004-07-09Re: [OT] Mojibake (was RE: How about a typology for input methods)
2885suzmccarth2004-07-09Essential Unity was: From Peter Constable, 2001
2886Richard Ishida2004-07-09Re: [OT] Mojibake (was RE: How about a typology for input methods)
2887suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: Ideographic was: and how are they encoded?
2888Patrick Chew2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2889suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: Essential Unity (Jaffre)
2890suzmccarth2004-07-09Re: Essential Unity
2891Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: How about a typology for input methods
2892Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2893Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: From Peter Constable, 2001
2894Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2895Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: Ideographic was: and how are they encoded?
2896Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: Essential Unity was: From Peter Constable, 2001
2897Peter T. Daniels2004-07-09Re: Essential Unity
2898John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: and how are they encoded?
2899John H. Jenkins2004-07-09Re: Ideographic was: and how are they encoded?
Later messages