NumberAuthorDateTitle
Earlier messages
19100CeiSerith@...2003-02-23Re: [tied] Gundestrup
19101CeiSerith@...2003-02-23Re: [tied] Gundestrup
19102P&G2003-02-23Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19103P&G2003-02-23Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19104P&G2003-02-23Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19105P&G2003-02-23Re: [tied] latin esse
19106Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-23Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19107aquila_grande 2003-02-23Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19108alex_lycos2003-02-23Re: [tied] latin esse
19109João Simões Lopes Filho2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19110alex_lycos2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19111Daniel J. Milton 2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19112Abdullah Konushevci2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19113I know that you are there!2003-02-23I can't speak...
19114alex_lycos2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19115I know that you are there!2003-02-23Reference
19116Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-23Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19117Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19118Abdullah Konushevci2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19119João Simões Lopes Filho2003-02-23Re: [tied] frog
19120Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-23Re: [tied] Reference
19121meg metcalf2003-02-23Fwd: Fw: Good Luck!
19122Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-23Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19123Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19124Pozdniakov Konstantin2003-02-24unsubscribe
19125Mark Williamson2003-02-24Re: [tied] Reference
19126S.Kalyanaraman 2003-02-24Re: Gundestrup
19127Glen Gordon2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19128Glen Gordon2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19129Glen Gordon2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19130Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-24Re: [tied] Reference
19131Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19132Glen Gordon2003-02-24Re: [tied] Reference
19133Glen Gordon2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19134tgpedersen 2003-02-24[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19135tgpedersen 2003-02-24[tied] Re: Pronouns again
19136tgpedersen 2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *aussiio-
19137tgpedersen 2003-02-24[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19138Abdullah Konushevci 2003-02-24Re: [tied] frog
19139tgpedersen 2003-02-24[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19140tgpedersen 2003-02-24Re: [tied] Gundestrup
19141tgpedersen 2003-02-24Re: [tied] Gundestrup
19142tgpedersen 2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19143tgpedersen 2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19144Juha Savolainen2003-02-24Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19145Juha Savolainen2003-02-24Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19146tgpedersen 2003-02-24Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19147Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19148CeiSerith@...2003-02-24Re: [tied] Gundestrup
19149Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19150Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19151PMGA232003-02-24Re: [tied] I can't speak...
19152Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19153Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19154P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19155P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19156P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] latin esse
19157P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] Reference
19158Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-24Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19159Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-24Re: Re[2]: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19160Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-24Re: [tied] "Simple" Future
19161Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19162Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-24Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19163alex_lycos2003-02-24PIE *kwokt
19164cybalist@yahoogroups.com2003-02-24New poll for cybalist
19165cybalist@yahoogroups.com2003-02-24New poll for cybalist
19166alex_lycos2003-02-24Re: [tied] frog
19167Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19168P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19169P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19170Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19171P&G2003-02-24Re: [tied] "Simple" Future
19172Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19173Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-24[tied] English "voiced" stops
19174Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-24Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?
19175Michael J Smith2003-02-24(no subject)
19176Abdullah Konushevci 2003-02-24Re: [tied] frog
19177Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-24Re: [tied] (unknown)
19178Michael J Smith2003-02-24(no subject)
19179Michael J Smith2003-02-24Re: [tied] Gundestrup
19180Abdullah Konushevci 2003-02-24Re: PIE *kwokt
19181Abdullah Konushevci 2003-02-24(no subject)
19182Daniel J. Milton 2003-02-25(no subject)
19183Brian M. Scott2003-02-25Re[2]: [tied] Reference
19184Brian M. Scott2003-02-25Re[2]: [tied] PIE *aussiio-
19185gknysh 2003-02-25[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19186Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-25Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19187Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-25Re: [tied] "Simple" Future
19188Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-25Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19189Patrick C. Ryan2003-02-25Re: [tied] English "voiced" stops
19190alex_lycos2003-02-25Re: [tied] Re: PIE *kwokt
19191alex_lycos2003-02-25Re: [tied] (unknown)
19192alex_lycos2003-02-25Re: [tied] frog
19193Max Dashu2003-02-25Re: [tied] frog
19194Miguel Carrasquer2003-02-25Re: [tied] Laryngeal theory as an unnatural
19195Piotr Gasiorowski2003-02-25Re: [tied] (unknown)
19196tgpedersen 2003-02-25[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19197tgpedersen 2003-02-25[tied] Re: "Will the 'real' linguist please stand up?"
19198tgpedersen 2003-02-25Re: [tied] More nonsense: Is English /d/ truely voiced?
19199tgpedersen 2003-02-25Re: [tied] Gundestrup
Later messages