On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:25:39 +0100, Piotr Gasiorowski
<
piotr.gasiorowski@...> wrote:
>No, Glen, it's a *k^. Sorry I didn't make it clear.
I think it's a *k^ too, but the evidence is rather weak (NPers. xirs
and Ossetic ars). Perhaps PKartv. *dars^tw "bear" if from *r.s^tos <
*r.k^tos, like *os^txw "4" from *os^toh3 "8".
=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...