From: Mark Williamson
Message: 19125
Date: 2003-02-24
>There's a radical difference between a documented language and aWell, what I meant is not that I mind long explanations of whys, but I can't
>reconstructed one: in the latter case _nothing_ is directly documented and
>_everything_ is hypothetical, so you have to know something about the
>technical side of reconstruction methods if you want to be able to judge
>for yourself whether a given piece of reconstruction is valid in the first
>place, whether the meaning proposed for a given form is justified, etc. On
>the other hand, once you master the methods, you don't really need A
>Beginner's Guide to PIE Grammar; you can write one yourself :-) . All
>right, I know what you mean, but I haven't seen any up-to-date handbook
>like that. It's standard practice at least to explain the whys and
>wherefores of comparative method first.
>http://flaez.ch/pok/index.htmlI didn't even know that such a page existed, it isn't in the Database, nor
>
>This index to the online version of Pokorny's dictionary allows you to
>search it according to forms found in a given language (if you can work out
>the German abbreviations of language names). Not quite what you have
>ordered, but I hope it may help a little.
>
>Piotr