Re: [tied] Re: PIE *kwokt

From: alex_lycos
Message: 19190
Date: 2003-02-25

a_konushevci@... wrote:
> Albanian cognat of this word is shkurte, suffixed form from sh- +
> kurte, when sh- is intensifying suffix. I thing that Latin
> coturnix, -icis (Plaut.)is builded in accordance with paradigm
> cornix, -icis. With same suffix I think is created also Albanian
> word çukapikth/pikth "Woodpecker" < *çukapiks, through evoluation /-
> s-/ > /-th-/ as I explained before. It seems that this suffix was
> common for birds names in PIE
> Albanian form could be part of this root, if we have to deal with
> metathesis t - r > r -t. The name of this bird take in Albanian
> figurative meaning "Whore"

I was aware of albanian cognate but I could not analyse it.
The Albanian c^uka+pikth has the romanian cognate c^okã+nitoare (
ciocãnitoare)
Unfortunately DEX gives it as a derivative of "ciocani"= to knock at, to
peck.
I see it otherways since Albanian "c^ok" is the same with Rom "c^oc
(cioc) meaning beak .
Funny is that "ciocani"= to peck is given as a derivative from "ciocan"=
hammer and this one should be an loanword from slavic "cekanU"
And it is interesting the rule applies again. Some scholars belive that
PIE kW > p and gW > b in Romanian when not followed by /e/ & /i/ and kW
>k and gW > g when not fallowed by /e/ and /i/.

If the sufix "icis"- was common for PIE it should be found in Slavic
too. Which should be the actual form in Slavic languages?