Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 19131
Date: 2003-02-24

----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Gordon" <glengordon01@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] PIE *ts ?


> Hmm, interesting. However, thinking more on the *xrtKos
counterexample, I can't help but notice that in this case we have a uvular after the *t.

No, Glen, it's a *k^. Sorry I didn't make it clear.

Piotr