From: aquila_grande
Message: 19107
Date: 2003-02-23
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:46:47 -0000, "aquila_grandelittle.
> <aquila_grande@...>" <aquila_grande@...> wrote:
>
> >I think there is a tendensy in modern Germanic languages to shift
> >from a voised - unvoiced -opposition to an aspirated -unaspirated -
> >opposition.
> >
> >I think English is in this transformation process.
> >
> >In Scandinavian, Danish, has by now an aspirated - unaspirated
> >opposition.
> >
> >In Norwegian that is more conservative, the opposition is still
> >voiced-unvoiced, and aspiration or not aspiration counts very
>of
> I'm pretty sure this isn't anything recent, and has been a feature
> Germanic for thousands of years, since the beginning: the Grimmshift
> (p > f, t > รพ, k > h) and the High German shift (p > pf, t > ts, k >
> kx) can be explained in no other way. If aspiration is not a strong
> feature of Norwegian, that's surely an innovation. The most
> conservative Nordic language, Icelandic, has no voiced stops at all
> (the inventory being: weak unaspirated /b./, hard unaspirated /p/,
> weak aspirated /b.h/, hard pre-aspirated /hp/, and hard aspirated
> /ph/).
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...