Number | Author | Date | Title |
Earlier messages |
65200 | george knysh | 2009-10-07 | Re: Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65201 | Petr Hrubis | 2009-10-07 | Re: "Venedic runes" -- correction |
65202 | danjmi | 2009-10-08 | Re: African Names |
65203 | Rick McCallister | 2009-10-08 | Re: African Names |
65204 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-09 | "Ive even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set to It |
65205 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-09 | Re: "Ive even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set t |
65206 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-09 | Re: "Ive even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set t |
65207 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-09 | Re: "Ive even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set t |
65208 | Alexandru Moeller | 2009-10-09 | Re: � |
65209 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-11 | Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber |
65210 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-11 | Lith. inóti |
65211 | Alexandru Moeller | 2009-10-11 | Re: Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber |
65212 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-11 | Re: Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber |
65213 | Alexandru Moeller | 2009-10-11 | Re: Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber |
65214 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-11 | Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65215 | Torsten | 2009-10-12 | Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65216 | Torsten | 2009-10-12 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65217 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-12 | Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65218 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2009-10-12 | Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65219 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-13 | Re: hound |
65220 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-13 | Re: African Names |
65221 | andythewiros | 2009-10-13 | Re: hound |
65222 | Richard Wordingham | 2009-10-13 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65223 | andythewiros | 2009-10-13 | Re: hound |
65224 | Torsten | 2009-10-13 | Re: hound |
65225 | Torsten | 2009-10-13 | Re: hound |
65226 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-13 | [tied] Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65227 | Torsten | 2009-10-13 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65228 | Torsten | 2009-10-13 | Re: hound |
65229 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2009-10-13 | Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65230 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-13 | [tied] Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65231 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2009-10-13 | Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65232 | Torsten | 2009-10-13 | Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65233 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-14 | Re: Lith. inóti - why not a root g^neHH-? |
65234 | andythewiros | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65235 | Torsten | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65236 | johnvertical@... | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65237 | johnvertical@... | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65238 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-14 | Re: hound |
65239 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65240 | Torsten | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65241 | Torsten | 2009-10-14 | Re: hound |
65242 | Torsten | 2009-10-14 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65243 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65244 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65245 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65246 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65247 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65248 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65249 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65250 | johnvertical@... | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65251 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65252 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65253 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65254 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65255 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65256 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65257 | Torsten | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65258 | andythewiros | 2009-10-15 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65259 | johnvertical@... | 2009-10-16 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65260 | bmscotttg | 2009-10-16 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65261 | andythewiros | 2009-10-16 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65262 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-16 | Re: hound |
65263 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-16 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65264 | Torsten | 2009-10-17 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65265 | andythewiros | 2009-10-18 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them |
65266 | Torsten | 2009-10-19 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65267 | johnvertical@... | 2009-10-19 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65268 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-19 | Re: hound |
65269 | Torsten | 2009-10-20 | Re: hound |
65270 | Torsten | 2009-10-20 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65271 | Torsten | 2009-10-20 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, correction |
65272 | george knysh | 2009-10-21 | Costoboci |
65273 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-22 | Re: hound |
65274 | Torsten | 2009-10-22 | Jastorf - Przeworsk |
65275 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65276 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65277 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65278 | george knysh | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65279 | alexandru_mg3 | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65280 | george knysh | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65281 | Torsten | 2009-10-23 | Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk |
65282 | Torsten | 2009-10-23 | Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk |
65283 | dgkilday57 | 2009-10-23 | Re: hound |
65284 | herhetzl | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65285 | george knysh | 2009-10-23 | Re: Costoboci |
65286 | patrick cuadrado | 2009-10-24 | Re: Costoboci |
65287 | Brian M. Scott | 2009-10-24 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65288 | Torsten | 2009-10-24 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65289 | Torsten | 2009-10-24 | Re: I, Hercules [was: A "Germanic" query] |
65290 | ehlsmith | 2009-10-24 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65291 | Torsten | 2009-10-24 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65292 | Torsten | 2009-10-24 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65293 | gknysh | 2009-10-24 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
65294 | george knysh | 2009-10-24 | Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk |
65295 | Rick McCallister | 2009-10-24 | Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk |
65296 | Brian M. Scott | 2009-10-25 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65297 | Torsten | 2009-10-25 | Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk |
65298 | Torsten | 2009-10-25 | Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests |
65299 | Torsten | 2009-10-25 | Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins |
Later messages |