NumberAuthorDateTitle
Earlier messages
65200george knysh2009-10-07Re: Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65201Petr Hrubis2009-10-07Re: "Venedic runes" -- correction
65202danjmi2009-10-08Re: African Names
65203Rick McCallister2009-10-08Re: African Names
65204alexandru_mg32009-10-09"I’ve even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set to It
65205alexandru_mg32009-10-09Re: "I’ve even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set t
65206alexandru_mg32009-10-09Re: "I’ve even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set t
65207alexandru_mg32009-10-09Re: "I’ve even written a work in Getic,where savage words are set t
65208Alexandru Moeller2009-10-09Re: �
65209alexandru_mg32009-10-11Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber
65210alexandru_mg32009-10-11Lith. žinóti
65211Alexandru Moeller2009-10-11Re: Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber
65212alexandru_mg32009-10-11Re: Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber
65213Alexandru Moeller2009-10-11Re: Rumanian uger and Latin u:ber
65214alexandru_mg32009-10-11Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65215Torsten2009-10-12Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65216Torsten2009-10-12Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65217alexandru_mg32009-10-12Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65218Piotr Gasiorowski2009-10-12Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65219dgkilday572009-10-13Re: hound
65220dgkilday572009-10-13Re: African Names
65221andythewiros2009-10-13Re: hound
65222Richard Wordingham2009-10-13Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65223andythewiros2009-10-13Re: hound
65224Torsten2009-10-13Re: hound
65225Torsten2009-10-13Re: hound
65226alexandru_mg32009-10-13[tied] Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65227Torsten2009-10-13Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65228Torsten2009-10-13Re: hound
65229Piotr Gasiorowski2009-10-13Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65230alexandru_mg32009-10-13[tied] Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65231Piotr Gasiorowski2009-10-13Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65232Torsten2009-10-13Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65233alexandru_mg32009-10-14Re: Lith. žinóti - why not a root g^neHH-?
65234andythewiros2009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65235Torsten2009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65236johnvertical@...2009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65237johnvertical@...2009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65238dgkilday572009-10-14Re: hound
65239dgkilday572009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65240Torsten2009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65241Torsten2009-10-14Re: hound
65242Torsten2009-10-14Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65243Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65244andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65245andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65246Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65247andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65248Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65249Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65250johnvertical@...2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65251andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65252Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65253andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65254Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65255dgkilday572009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65256andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65257Torsten2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65258andythewiros2009-10-15Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65259johnvertical@...2009-10-16Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65260bmscotttg2009-10-16Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65261andythewiros2009-10-16Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65262dgkilday572009-10-16Re: hound
65263dgkilday572009-10-16Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65264Torsten2009-10-17Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65265andythewiros2009-10-18Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, a whole bundle of them
65266Torsten2009-10-19Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65267johnvertical@...2009-10-19Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65268dgkilday572009-10-19Re: hound
65269Torsten2009-10-20Re: hound
65270Torsten2009-10-20Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65271Torsten2009-10-20Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests, correction
65272george knysh2009-10-21Costoboci
65273dgkilday572009-10-22Re: hound
65274Torsten2009-10-22Jastorf - Przeworsk
65275alexandru_mg32009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65276alexandru_mg32009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65277alexandru_mg32009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65278george knysh2009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65279alexandru_mg32009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65280george knysh2009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65281Torsten2009-10-23Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk
65282Torsten2009-10-23Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk
65283dgkilday572009-10-23Re: hound
65284herhetzl2009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65285george knysh2009-10-23Re: Costoboci
65286patrick cuadrado2009-10-24Re: Costoboci
65287Brian M. Scott2009-10-24Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65288Torsten2009-10-24Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65289Torsten2009-10-24Re: I, Hercules [was: A "Germanic" query]
65290ehlsmith2009-10-24Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65291Torsten2009-10-24Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65292Torsten2009-10-24Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65293gknysh2009-10-24Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
65294george knysh2009-10-24Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk
65295Rick McCallister2009-10-24Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk
65296Brian M. Scott2009-10-25Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65297Torsten2009-10-25Re: Jastorf - Przeworsk
65298Torsten2009-10-25Re: *ka/unt- etc, new conquests
65299Torsten2009-10-25Fw: Re: [tied] Re: Frankish origins
Later messages