| Number | Author | Date | Title |
|---|
| Earlier messages |
| 4100 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-02 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil (was RE: Effect of the Medium (was: C |
| 4101 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-02 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4102 | Marco Cimarosti | 2005-02-02 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4103 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-02 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4104 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-03 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil (was RE: Effect of the Medium (was: C |
| 4105 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-03 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4106 | wkuhl44238@... | 2005-02-03 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4107 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-03 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil (was RE: Effect of the Medium (was: C |
| 4108 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-03 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4109 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-03 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil (was RE: Effect of the Medium (was: C |
| 4110 | Philip Newton | 2005-02-03 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4111 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-03 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil (was RE: Effect of the Medium (was: C |
| 4112 | wkuhl44238@... | 2005-02-03 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4113 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-03 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil (was RE: Effect of the Medium (was: C |
| 4114 | Donald Z. Osborn | 2005-02-05 | "Writing System Alternativs" [sic] |
| 4115 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-06 | Re: "Writing System Alternativs" [sic] |
| 4116 | Mark E. Shoulson | 2005-02-06 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4117 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-06 | Re: Chinese transliteration table from Coulmas |
| 4118 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-07 | back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4119 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-07 | Re: back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4120 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-07 | Re: back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4121 | Patrick Chew | 2005-02-07 | Re: back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4122 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-07 | Re: back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4123 | Marco Cimarosti | 2005-02-07 | Re: "Writing System Alternativs" [sic] |
| 4124 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-07 | Re: back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4125 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-07 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil |
| 4126 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-07 | Spelling systems <-- Re: "Writing System Alternativs" [sic] |
| 4127 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-08 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil |
| 4128 | Marco Cimarosti | 2005-02-08 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil |
| 4129 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-08 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil |
| 4130 | John H. Jenkins | 2005-02-08 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil |
| 4131 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-09 | Zero (was: Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil) |
| 4132 | Marco Cimarosti | 2005-02-09 | Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil |
| 4133 | qalam@yahoogroups.com | 2005-02-09 | New file uploaded to qalam |
| 4134 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-09 | Re: back to classification (was Chinese transliteration) |
| 4135 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-09 | Re: Zero (was: Re: Origins of Cree and Tamil) |
| 4136 | Don Osborn | 2005-02-10 | New group: "MINEL" - The future of our linguistic diversity |
| 4137 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-11 | Reverting to older forms to try to evade spam filters |
| 4138 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-12 | dyslexia and script |
| 4139 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-12 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4140 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-12 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4141 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-12 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4142 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-12 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4143 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4144 | Tex Texin | 2005-02-13 | 27th Unicode Conference - April 6-8, 2005 Berlin, Germany |
| 4145 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4146 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4147 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script (error in previous post) |
| 4148 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script (error in previous post) |
| 4149 | i18n@... | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script (error in previous post) |
| 4150 | Richard Wordingham | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4151 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4152 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-13 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4153 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-13 | Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4154 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-14 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4155 | Randall Hunt | 2005-02-14 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4156 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-14 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4157 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-14 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4158 | Doug Ewell | 2005-02-14 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4159 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-15 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4160 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-15 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4161 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-15 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4162 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-15 | An important article about computer typography |
| 4163 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-15 | Another one (grid-fitting) |
| 4164 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-15 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4165 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-15 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4166 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-15 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4167 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-15 | Re: dyslexia and script |
| 4168 | Henrik Theiling | 2005-02-15 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4169 | Richard Wordingham | 2005-02-15 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4170 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4171 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4172 | i18n@... | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4173 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-16 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4174 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4175 | i18n@... | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4176 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-16 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4177 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4178 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4179 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4180 | Nicholas Bodley | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4181 | i18n@... | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4182 | i18n@... | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4183 | i18n@... | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4184 | Mark E. Shoulson | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4185 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4186 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4187 | Peter Constable | 2005-02-16 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4188 | Peter Constable | 2005-02-16 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4189 | Henrik Theiling | 2005-02-16 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4190 | i18n@... | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? - utterances |
| 4191 | Patrick Chew | 2005-02-16 | [OT] Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4192 | suzmccarth | 2005-02-16 | [OT] Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4193 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-16 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| 4194 | Peter T. Daniels | 2005-02-16 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? - utterances |
| 4195 | Mark E. Shoulson | 2005-02-17 | Re: [OT] Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4196 | i18n@... | 2005-02-17 | Re: [OT] Re: Are computer icons on-topic? |
| 4197 | i18n@... | 2005-02-17 | Re: Are computer icons on-topic? - utterances |
| 4198 | qalam@yahoogroups.com | 2005-02-17 | New file uploaded to qalam |
| 4199 | Thomas T. Pedersen | 2005-02-17 | Re: An important article about computer typography |
| Later messages |