suzmccarth wrote:

>C.K.Leung also refers to the "internal structure of characters
>encompassing both meaning (morpho) and sound (phonemics)". I think
>that this must be the origin of my much criticised use of the
>term "morphophonemic" last summer, when I used the term with a
>meaning other than the usual one (simply to describe units which
>represents meaning and sound). For myself, I prefer to think of the
>word morphophonemic as being able to have more than one meaning, but
>I accept that others here don't - so no need to tell me this is
>unacceptable.
>
>

You can just call that "ambiguous" or even "polysemous" if you want to
sound erudite.

~mark