Peter T. Daniels <grammatim at worldnet dot att dot net> wrote:

> I don't really believe in dyxlexia -- there can't be a single neural
> anomaly having to do with reading/writing because the abilities to
> read/write aren't the result of evolution/adaptation -- but I
> occasionally see chapters or articles.

Uh, Peter... you may not remember this, but one of your main objections
to my invented script, back in November 2000, was that it would be
difficult for readers with dyslexia.

From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qalam/message/130:

> Rotations and reflections are a Bad Thing. We've got p b d q , which
> are problematic enough for learners and dyslexics. You (and Shaw) have
> lots more sets like that. (I shudder to think of the amount of
> dyxlexia in Cree-script societies!)

Same "dyxlexia" spelling, BTW.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
Ewellic script: http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ewellic.html