On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:12:37 -0500, Peter T. Daniels
<grammatim@...> wrote:

[nb]

>> I'll accept the close connection with utterance (which, by the way,
>> encompasses more than speech, as I hear it).
>
> ? An utterance is a stretch of speech.

Is ululation an utterance?

> ?

[...]

> ?

[...]

> ?

Perhaps I was naïve in thinking that all Unicode code points that define
symbols were also to be considered part of one or more writing systems.
Sorry if I wasted List time/energy on this.

--
Nicholas Bodley /*|*\ Waltham, Mass.
The curious hermit -- autodidact and polymath
Freedom from hypocrisy is a very good idea.