From: suzmccarth
Message: 4171
Date: 2005-02-16
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 09:46:04 -0800, Doug Ewell <dewell@...> wrote:early
>
> > Lots of things convey meaning, and of course drawings were an
> > predecessor of writing. But I think they fail to be true writingmeaning.
> > systems to the extent that they cannot convey *arbitrary*
> [...]in this
> > "Computer icons" are no different from any other small pictures
> > regard. An octagonal red stop sign or circle-with-diagonal-slash, or
> > for that matter a drawing of a human hand with the index (ormiddle!)
> > finger raised, does not become fundamentally different because itby
> > appears on a computer screen.
> >
> > Writing is 21st-century writing.
>
> Good! Thank you. Ask, and ye shall receive.
>
> > [...] animated icons. These were annoying beyond your wildest
> > imagination; think of your Program Manager windows being overrun
> > dozens of tiny frenetic pop-up ads and you've got the idea.run the
>
> I have suggested, only partly in jest, that some very-animated ads
> risk of triggering epileptic seizures, surely no joking matter.Not a joking matter.
> suggested to the Opera Software people that it would be nice to beable to
> use a click-and-drag filled rectangle (as in a computer drawingprogram)
> to cover a particularly-annoying ad.Very useful idea. It could be installed on the individual