From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 4174
Date: 2005-02-16
>No.
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:12:37 -0500, Peter T. Daniels
> <grammatim@...> wrote:
>
> [nb]
> >> I'll accept the close connection with utterance (which, by the way,
> >> encompasses more than speech, as I hear it).
> >
> > ? An utterance is a stretch of speech.
>
> Is ululation an utterance?
> > ?Yet you chose not to answer the questions!
> [...]
> > ?
> [...]
> > ?
>
> Perhaps I was naïve in thinking that all Unicode code points that define
> symbols were also to be considered part of one or more writing systems.
> Sorry if I wasted List time/energy on this.