Nicholas Bodley wrote:

>
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:12:37 -0500, Peter T. Daniels
> <grammatim@...> wrote:
>
> [nb]
> >> I'll accept the close connection with utterance (which, by the way,
> >> encompasses more than speech, as I hear it).
> >
> > ? An utterance is a stretch of speech.
>
> Is ululation an utterance?

No.

> > ?
> [...]
> > ?
> [...]
> > ?
>
> Perhaps I was naïve in thinking that all Unicode code points that define
> symbols were also to be considered part of one or more writing systems.
> Sorry if I wasted List time/energy on this.

Yet you chose not to answer the questions!
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...