Number | Author | Date | Title |
45603 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-02 | kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45605 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-02 | Re: [tied] kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45606 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-02 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45607 | Rick McCallister | 2006-08-02 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45609 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-02 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45612 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45613 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-03 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45616 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45618 | Sergejus Tarasovas | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45619 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45621 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45623 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45625 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45626 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-03 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45630 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-04 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45631 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-04 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45632 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-04 | Pseudo-Leskien [was: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE?] |
45635 | stlatos | 2006-08-05 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45636 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-05 | Re: Pseudo-Leskien [was: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE?] |
45637 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-05 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45640 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-07 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45641 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-07 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45642 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-07 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45643 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-07 | Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45647 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45650 | Joao S. Lopes | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45651 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45652 | Joao S. Lopes | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45654 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45655 | Sean Whalen | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45658 | Sean Whalen | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45659 | Joao S. Lopes | 2006-08-08 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45660 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-09 | Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45661 | tgpedersen | 2006-08-09 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem built-in already in PIE? |
45662 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-09 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45666 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2006-08-09 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45671 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-10 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45675 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-10 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45676 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2006-08-10 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45677 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-10 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45682 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-11 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45683 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-11 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45685 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-11 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45686 | Sean Whalen | 2006-08-11 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45687 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-12 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45690 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2006-08-12 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45692 | alex | 2006-08-12 | Re: [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45694 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2006-08-12 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45697 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-13 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45698 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-13 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45700 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-13 | [tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45701 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2006-08-13 | Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45706 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-13 | Illyrian |
45708 | Abdullah Konushevci | 2006-08-14 | Re: Illyrian |
45717 | tolgs001 | 2006-08-14 | Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45718 | altamix | 2006-08-14 | Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45722 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-14 | Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |
45723 | alexandru_mg3 | 2006-08-14 | Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i |