--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
<akonushevci@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> > <akonushevci@> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > 1. PIE *e:(also *a:)(*dHeh1-weh2) > Dacian a: (*da:-wa:)
> > Maybe Abdullah, you can complete here if there was PIE e: >
Illyrian
> > a: too?
>
> No, I am not aware of such outcome.
>
> Konushevci
>
We need the outcomes for Illyrian, to find out if it is closer or
not with PAlbanian one (for Dacian I couldn't find until now any
discrepancy):
1. e/accented > je,ja (see Dacian Diegis etc...)
-> as I know is Not valid for Illyrian
-> However could Japyges to reflect an old e?
2. e: > a: (see Dacian da:wa:)
-> this could be true also for Illyrian (but I don't remember where
I read it and the related example)
3. o > a (see Dacian Tamasi-da:wa:)
-> this is a delicate point
(Latin Scodra and Alb. Shkodër seems to reflect an o?)
4. ai > ai (see Dacian Aizisis I will reconstruct
*Aidzisis)
->Seems that Scerdilaidas (Skerdilaidas) could be a good Example for
Illyrian too
5. au > au
-> true for Illyrian
6. eu > eu
-> true for Illyrian
Marius