Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
> <akonushevci@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, alex <alxmoeller@> wrote:

>
>
> 1. PIE *e:(also *a:)(*dHeh1-weh2) > Dacian a: (*da:-wa:)
>

If your derivation is correct and it looks to me more correct then
other assumptions, you have again *eH1 > *e: > Alb. /o/, cf.
Alb.(v)nd-oj 'to put', aor. <ndova> < *en-dhe:-n-yo and <vend> 'place'
remodeled due to reduced form <vê>, reshaped like zâ/zë 'to catch',
lâ/lë 'to leave' and *e: Dacian /a/ in dava.

>
> Marius
>
> Maybe Abdullah, you can complete here if there was PIE e: > Illyrian
> a: too?

No, I am not aware of such outcome.

Konushevci