[tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, alex <alxmoeller@...> wrote:

>
>
>
> alexandru_mg3 schrieb:
> .
> >
> > It's true that the o>oa exists for Romanian (in some contexts:
> > mainly before e and ã, the a-context 'is not clear enough'):
>
> there is not mainly but entirely before "ã"(&) and "e". So far I
> remember there is no exception.
>
>

I used 'mainly' only because I didn't want to open any debate on
this topic knowing that Rosetti included a too in this context...
(but I agree with you)

Marius