[tied] Re: kentum/satem: why Lithuanian kg before e/i

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Abdullah Konushevci"
<akonushevci@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, alex <alxmoeller@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > but the
> > > timeframes didn't match here: there isn't any other PAlb a: >
> Rom o
> > > (> oa) <-> Alb o in the common words (see raTa, madzare)
> >
> > I am not sure I really got what you mean here :
> > Palb "a:" > Rom "o" (> oa)<-> Alb "o" (see ratsa, madzare).
> >
> > >
> > > In addition Rom c^ for Alb s shows us a very old loan for the
> Balkan
> > > Latin
> >
> Alex
> ************

> we have the same equation IE *e: > Alb. /o/ and Pre-Romanian /a/.
>
> Konushevci
>

The equation is correct (I will not talk about your proposed
etymologies here) but is better to add that the intermediary stage
of the Early-PAlb: e: was PAlb a:


1. PIE *e:(also *a:)(*dHeh1-weh2) > Dacian a: (*da:-wa:)

2. PIE *e:(also *a:) > Pre-Romanian a: > Romanian a (raTa,
madzare)

3. PIE *e:(also *a:) > PAlb. a: > Late-PAlb o > Alb o
(modhull, rosë)

Once again a strong fit between Proto-Albanian, Dacian and Pre-
Romanian

Marius

Maybe Abdullah, you can complete here if there was PIE e: > Illyrian
a: too?