Earlier messages
33300enlil@...2004-06-27Re: [tied] Bader's article on *-os(y)o
33301P&G2004-06-27Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33302elmeras20002004-06-27[tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33303Miguel Carrasquer2004-06-27Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33304Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-06-27Re: [tied] Bader's article on *-os(y)o
33305Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-06-28Re: [tied] Bader's article on *-os(y)o (fwd)
33306elmeras20002004-06-28[tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33307P&G2004-06-28Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33308tgpedersen2004-06-28Re: More water, poles, catch...
33309Piotr Gasiorowski2004-06-28Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33310Piotr Gasiorowski2004-06-28Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33311elmeras20002004-06-28Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33312enlil@...2004-06-29Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33313Miguel Carrasquer2004-06-29Re: [tied] Re: More water, poles, catch...
33314tgpedersen2004-06-29Water: -g, -d, -r
33315tgpedersen2004-06-29[tied] Re: More water, poles, catch...
33316Brian M. Scott2004-06-29Re: [tied] Re: More water, poles, catch...
33317elmeras20002004-06-29Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33318Miguel Carrasquer2004-06-29Re: [tied] Water: -g, -d, -r
33319enlil@...2004-06-29Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33320elmeras20002004-06-29Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33321elmeras20002004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33322P&G2004-06-30Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33323tgpedersen2004-06-30Re: [tied] Water: -g, -d, -r
33324tgpedersen2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33325Piotr Gasiorowski2004-06-30Re: [tied] Re: PIE *y > Gr ?
33326enlil@...2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33327Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33328Miguel Carrasquer2004-06-30Re: [tied] Water: -g, -d, -r
33329Miguel Carrasquer2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33330enlil@...2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33331enlil@...2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33332enlil@...2004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33333enlil@...2004-06-30Re: [tied] Bader's article on *-os(y)o (fwd)
33334elmeras20002004-06-30Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33335elmeras20002004-07-01Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33336cybalist@yahoogroups.com2004-07-01File - Rules.txt
33337tgpedersen2004-07-01Re: [tied] IE vowels: The sequel.
33338elmeras20002004-07-01Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33339elmeras20002004-07-01Re: IE vowels: sequel
33340Richard Wordingham2004-07-01'Can' as Past Tense (was: Bader's article on *-os(y)o)
33341elmeras20002004-07-02Re: [tied] Bader's article on *-os(y)o (fwd)
33343tgpedersen2004-07-02Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33344Miguel Carrasquer2004-07-02Re: [tied] Foot/below
33345elmeras20002004-07-02Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33346tgpedersen2004-07-02Re: Foot/below
33347Miguel Carrasquer2004-07-02Re: [tied] Re: Foot/below
33348enlil@...2004-07-02Re: [tied] 'Can' as Past Tense (was: Bader's article on *-os(y)o)
33349enlil@...2004-07-02Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33350enlil@...2004-07-02Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33351elmeras20002004-07-03[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33352Richard Wordingham2004-07-03Re: [tied] 'Can' as Past Tense (was: Bader's article on *-os(y)o)
33353P&G2004-07-03Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33354P&G2004-07-03Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33355tgpedersen2004-07-03[tied] Re: Foot/below
33356tgpedersen2004-07-03[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33357tgpedersen2004-07-03[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33358tgpedersen2004-07-03gen. -yo
33359Richard Wordingham2004-07-03[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33360elmeras20002004-07-03[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33361Sergejus Tarasovas2004-07-03Re: ruki and laryngeals
33362P&G2004-07-04Re: [tied] 'Can' as Past Tense (was: Bader's article on *-os(y)o)
33363Harald Hammarström2004-07-04Re: [tied] Re: Unreality of One-Vowel Systems (was: Bader's artic
33364enlil@...2004-07-04Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33365enlil@...2004-07-04Re: [tied] 'Can' as Past Tense (was: Bader's article on *-os(y)o)
33366enlil@...2004-07-04Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33367enlil@...2004-07-04Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33368elmeras20002004-07-04[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33369enlil@...2004-07-04Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33370Brian M. Scott2004-07-04Re[2]: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33371enlil@...2004-07-05Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33372enlil@...2004-07-05Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33373Brian M. Scott2004-07-05Re[4]: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33374(no author)2004-07-05(no subject)
33375elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33376elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33377Brian M. Scott2004-07-05Re[6]: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33378enlil@...2004-07-05Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33379enlil@...2004-07-05Re: Re[6]: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33380Brian M. Scott2004-07-05Re[2]: [tied] 'Can' as Past Tense (was: Bader's article on *-os(y)o)
33381tgpedersen2004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33382tgpedersen2004-07-05Re: gen. -yo
33383Brian M. Scott2004-07-05Re: [tied] Re: gen. -yo
33384elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33385elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33386Exu Yangi2004-07-05Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33387tgpedersen2004-07-05Re: gen. -yo
33388elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33389elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33390mcv@...2004-07-05Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33391enlil@...2004-07-05Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33392elmeras20002004-07-05[tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33393Exu Yangi2004-07-06Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33394Exu Yangi2004-07-06Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33395mcv@...2004-07-06Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33396mcv@...2004-07-06Slavic *-os (*-om)
33397mcv@...2004-07-06Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33398Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen2004-07-06Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
33399enlil@...2004-07-06Re: [tied] Re: Monovocalism: sequel
Later messages