NumberAuthorDateTitle
34149Exu Yangi2004-09-14Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34151alex2004-09-14Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34153petusek2004-09-14Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34154alex2004-09-15Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34155Exu Yangi2004-09-15Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34156tgpedersen2004-09-15Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34157petusek2004-09-15Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34159andrew_and_inge2004-09-15[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34161andrew_and_inge2004-09-15[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34162andrew_and_inge2004-09-15Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34164Richard Wordingham2004-09-15Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34170Exu Yangi2004-09-16Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34172loreto bagio2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34173loreto bagio2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34174Exu Yangi2004-09-16Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34175Exu Yangi2004-09-16Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34176Richard Wordingham2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34178petusek2004-09-16Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34179petusek2004-09-16Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34180tgpedersen2004-09-16[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34182tgpedersen2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34183tgpedersen2004-09-16[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34184tgpedersen2004-09-16[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34186Richard Wordingham2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34187Richard Wordingham2004-09-16[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34188andrew_and_inge2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34189andrew_and_inge2004-09-16Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34190andrew_and_inge2004-09-16[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34192andrew_and_inge2004-09-16[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34193petusek2004-09-16Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34195Richard Wordingham2004-09-17Patterns in Khoisan Numerals (was: Why borrow 'seven'?)
34200tgpedersen2004-09-17[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34201tgpedersen2004-09-17Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34202Richard Wordingham2004-09-17Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34207andrew_and_inge2004-09-18[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34208andrew_and_inge2004-09-18Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34209andrew_and_inge2004-09-18Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34210Sergejus Tarasovas2004-09-18Co-moderatorial
34213andrew_and_inge2004-09-19Re: Co-moderatorial
34218Harald Hammarström2004-09-19Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34221petusek2004-09-19Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34223tgpedersen2004-09-20Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34224tgpedersen2004-09-20Re: Co-moderatorial
34233Exu Yangi2004-09-21Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34234Richard Wordingham2004-09-21Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34249enlil@...2004-09-23Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34250enlil@...2004-09-23Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34251enlil@...2004-09-23Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34252enlil@...2004-09-23Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34255enlil@...2004-09-23Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34257enlil@...2004-09-23Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34263Richard Wordingham2004-09-23[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34264Richard Wordingham2004-09-23Old Japanese Numbers (was: Why borrow 'seven'?)
34268tgpedersen2004-09-24Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34270tgpedersen2004-09-24[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34271tgpedersen2004-09-24[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34273loreto bagio2004-09-24[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34277loreto bagio2004-09-24Re: Old Japanese Numbers (was: Why borrow 'seven'?)
34279loreto bagio2004-09-24[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34280loreto bagio2004-09-24[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34288Richard Wordingham2004-09-24Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34300enlil@...2004-09-26Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34303petegray2004-09-26Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34304Âàäèì Ïîíàðÿäîâ2004-09-26Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34306Richard Wordingham2004-09-26[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34310Exu Yangi2004-09-27Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34311andrew_and_inge2004-09-27[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34322enlil@...2004-09-27Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34324Richard Wordingham2004-09-28[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34326enlil@...2004-09-28Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34327Brian M. Scott2004-09-28Re[2]: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34328loreto bagio2004-09-28[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34329loreto bagio2004-09-28[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34347Peter P2004-09-29Re: Venus [was: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)]
34348Daniel J. Milton2004-09-29Re: Venus [was: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)]
34381Harald Hammarström2004-09-30Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34387Harald Hammarström2004-09-30Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34393Richard Wordingham2004-09-30[tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)
34398Harald Hammarström2004-10-01Re: [tied] Re: Why borrow 'seven'? (was: IE right & 10)