From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 34263
Date: 2004-09-23
> Richard:happened
> > My idea is that the concept was tabooed, as I understand has
> > with 'hare' (details not to hand).root? I
>
> If it were tabooed, why would they all adopt the same Semitic
> don't think it was tabooed. I just think that it was holy. I don'tPre-Neolithic Semitic-based Mediterranean lingua franca? What's
> think that something that's holy need necessarily be a taboo.