| Number | Author | Date | Title |
|---|
| 21267 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-26 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21286 | P&G | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21287 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21288 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21289 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21290 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21291 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21292 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21294 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21299 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21302 | george knysh | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21304 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21306 | tolgs001 | 2003-04-27 | Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21307 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21310 | Miguel Carrasquer | 2003-04-27 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21318 | tgpedersen | 2003-04-28 | Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21321 | P&G | 2003-04-28 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21329 | P&G | 2003-04-28 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21333 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-28 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21334 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-28 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21336 | george knysh | 2003-04-28 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21349 | tolgs001 | 2003-04-29 | Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21373 | P&G | 2003-04-29 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21374 | P&G | 2003-04-29 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21376 | alex_lycos | 2003-04-29 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21383 | tolgs001 | 2003-04-29 | Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21387 | george knysh | 2003-04-29 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 21402 | P&G | 2003-04-30 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24429 | alex | 2003-07-12 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24443 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2003-07-12 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24444 | alex | 2003-07-12 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24445 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2003-07-12 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24447 | alex | 2003-07-12 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24471 | Exu Yangi | 2003-07-13 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24474 | Piotr Gasiorowski | 2003-07-13 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |
| 24478 | alex | 2003-07-13 | Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin? |