Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin?

From: alex_lycos
Message: 21292
Date: 2003-04-27

Piotr Gasiorowski wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 1:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin?
>
>> The rules for Romanian are I'd say an
>> order of magnitude less complex than the rules we need to derive
>> Modern French from Vulgar Latin
>
> .... or even the rules needed to derive any modern variety of English
> from Old English
>
> Piotr


:-))))
That remember me of Petru Maior "Romanian is the purest Latin at
all":-))))))