Re: [tied] Was proto-romance a pidgin?

P&G wrote:

>>> [Romanian's] almost total isolation from the rest of the
>>> Romance-speaking world from as early as the 3rd century
>
>> well Peter, I am afraid Piotr won't agree with that
>
> That's up to Piotr
>
>> Which isolation? Where?
>
> See Bàrtoli "Archivio glottologico italiano" 21 (1927!) pp 79ff and
> Puscariu "Die Tatwelt" (1937)pp7ff and the same author in "Etudes de
> linguistique roumaine" (1973) , 60 years later, and there has been no
> evidence to change his opinion. See also Bonfante "TheOrigin of the
> Romance Languages" (1999) p127:
> "As for Dacia, we may take it for granted that after the third
> century it was almost completely cut off from the rest of the Roman
> world; no further linguistic wave was to reach it."
> This is, of course, due to the withdrawal of the Romans in AD 271
>
> Peter

Well, I beg you are one of the shcolars who do not belive in the
emigration of Romanians from SOuth to North of Danube , but beieves in
the continuity of them in Dacia:))

And I beg you are not one of the shcolars who belives that Romanian's
cradle has been on the both shores of Danube since the south one was
inside of the Roman Empire, so there could not be any isolation :-)))

P.S. 274= withdraw of the romans. And the Romanians are what? Are they
not anymore the Romans then? Well, funny logic..