From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 54432
Date: 2008-03-01
> >a) "bo:id as source of baid-(yti) in Lithuanian"I need to highlight again this to you :
> >
> > or regardingis
> >
> >b) "your bHh2i or bHih2" (this is like to to say that 'something
> >black or white') in addition there is no *bHhi- possible in PIEBecause *bHh- being impossible to be pronounced ->and because, in
>
> Why not? It's simply the zero grade of *bheHi-.
> > or regardingI really doubt. (this was only one of your 'hocus-pocus' with
> >
> >c) "your PIE different derivations for the same verb one PIE
> >derivation for Latvian and one PIE derivation for Lithuanian" -> (-
>
> >where is the Common Baltic ?)
>
> Given that the two verbs have slightly different semantics,
> and that verbs in *-i:ti are productive, there need not be
> any Commmon Baltic here.
> You have misunderstood me. Balto-Slavic productive verbs inYes I misunderstood you: I thought that you have talked in
> *-i:ti are almost always denominal or deverbal. They are
> derived either from another verb (e.g. Slavic nesti =>
> nositi), or from a noun/adjective (e.g. Slavic slava =>
> slaviti). In this case, the Lithuanian verb seems to be
> denominal (but I would feel better if I could consult
> Fraenkel).
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> miguelc@...