[tied] Re: *bhe-, -y, -w

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> Another thing is that if Piotr's rule Bw- > B-, for B labial, is
> right, then
> *bhuah2- "be" = *bhah2- "appear"

Hey, that's worth considering!

Jens