[tied] Re: *bhe-, -y, -w

From: tgpedersen
Message: 38479
Date: 2005-06-09

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
wrote:
>
> > Another thing is that if Piotr's rule Bw- > B-, for B labial, is
> > right, then
> > *bhuah2- "be" = *bhah2- "appear"
>
> Hey, that's worth considering!
>

Only glad to provide something useful :)

Torsten