NumberAuthorDateTitle
32537alex2004-05-10latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as aberran
32539Abdullah Konushevci2004-05-10latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as aberran
32546alex2004-05-11Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32548Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-11Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32551alex2004-05-11Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32555Richard Wordingham2004-05-11latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as aberran
32561alex2004-05-12Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32562Piotr Gasiorowski2004-05-12Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32563altamix2004-05-12latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as aberran
32564Richard Wordingham2004-05-12latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as aberran
32570Sergejus Tarasovas2004-05-12Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32575Miguel Carrasquer2004-05-12Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe
32578alex2004-05-12Re: latin geminate "ll" ( it was: Re: [tied] Re: *g'(h)- > d as abe