NumberAuthorDateTitle
21311alex_lycos2003-04-27Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21320Piotr Gasiorowski2003-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21322tgpedersen2003-04-28Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21326Piotr Gasiorowski2003-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21331P&G2003-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21335P&G2003-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21337Daniel J. Milton2003-04-28[tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21338alex_lycos2003-04-28Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21352P&G2003-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21354Piotr Gasiorowski2003-04-29[tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21365Andy Howey2003-04-29Tok Pisin "pikinini" (was Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?)
21369Daniel J. Milton2003-04-29Tok Pisin "pikinini" (was Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?)
21370alex_lycos2003-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21378alex_lycos2003-04-29Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21381Miguel Carrasquer2003-04-29Re: [tied] Tok Pisin "pikinini" (was Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin
21403m_iacomi2003-04-30Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21414Brian M. Scott2003-05-01Re[2]: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21416alex_lycos2003-05-01Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21418tgpedersen2003-05-01Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21419tgpedersen2003-05-01[tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21435Miguel Carrasquer2003-05-01Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21440alex_lycos2003-05-01Re: Re[2]: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21448P&G2003-05-02Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21463Brian M. Scott2003-05-02Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21473tgpedersen2003-05-03Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?
21474tgpedersen2003-05-03[tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?