Re: [tied] Re: Was proto-romance a pidgin?

tolgs001 wrote:

>> For these who means they know something about
>> thracian let us
>
> Your Thracian obsession. Why after all Thracian
> only, whilst neglecting Dacian-Moesian? :)
>
> George

This is the usual therm .
My quotation regarding the meaning is just vis a vis the try of some
shcolars to show what could mean in Thracian a certain word showing the
paralels to other languages. how dangerous away from reality such a try
could be, I guess is not hard to show.

alex