I thought the entries for "abjad" and "abugida" were discussed last year, with people who could fix them. Yet they currently read as badly or worse than they did at that time.

(My interest is only that I am citing publications that use the terminology without acknowledgment in order to demonstrate that it is not "idiosyncratic" or "heteroclite," as has recently been alleged in print.)
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]