Re: What's with the Unicode glossary?

At 14:52 -0700 2006-07-16, Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>I thought the entries for "abjad" and "abugida" were discussed last
>year, with people who could fix them. Yet they currently read as
>badly or worse than they did at that time.

What specific document are you looking at?
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com