Re: What's with the Unicode glossary?

From: Peter T. Daniels
Message: 6553
Date: 2006-07-23

Trying to carry on a conversation at one-week intervals just doesn't work. Seshat?


The one I got when I googled "unicode consortium" and glossary.

(My point in doing so was only to demonstrate that the terms have come into use without acknowledgment, i.e. they meet an important criterion for inclusion in a general dictionary.)

Moreover, I can't find a way to delete the extraneous yahoo!junk at the bottom and move my reply to the bottom where it belongs. (I am now in Verizon Yahoo! Beta.)
--
Peter T. Daniels grammatim@...



----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Everson <everson@...>
To: qalam@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 10:43:39 AM
Subject: Re: What's with the Unicode glossary?


At 14:52 -0700 2006-07-16, Peter T. Daniels wrote:
>I thought the entries for "abjad" and "abugida" were discussed last
>year, with people who could fix them. Yet they currently read as
>badly or worse than they did at that time.

What specific document are you looking at?
--
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype .com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Previous in thread: 6552
Next in thread: 6554
Previous message: 6552
Next message: 6554

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts