Dear Ong Yong Peng and freinds,
The early Buddhist monks were evidently forbidden to drink alcohol. The
relevant rule in the paatimokkha is formulated in such a way that one must
conclude that it belongs historically to the early stratum of the
paatimokkha (I am thinking of the use of the locative to denote the nimitta
i.e. the cause of an action). The story in the Vibhanga that explains the
laying down of the rule is hilarious, but no doubt an ad hoc invention. On
the other hand, the canonical "handbook" of ethics for Buddhist lay people,
the Singalovaadasuttanta, does not refer to drinking alcohol as a
kammakilesa, unlike murder, stealing, unlawful sex, and lying (in that
order), but it is nonetheless described as one of the gates to ruin
(apaayamukha), and is therefore condemned.
Ole
-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra:
Pali@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
Pali@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af Ong Yong
Peng
Sendt: 13. august 2005 12:57
Til:
Pali@yahoogroups.com
Emne: [Pali] Re: The precepts: abstention from alcohol
Dear Ven. Pesala, Alan, Dmytro, Ole, John, Nina, Robert, Piya,
Stephen and friends,
thanks for the interesting discussion. I think this is a very popular
topic among Buddhists, and it has appeared at least once on this list.
The Chinese classified this precept as a "covering" precept, i.e. as
a preventive measure to the other four precepts.
The incident given below seems to be for the monks. I have heard of
another story where a person violates all the first four precepts
after getting drunk, leading to the Buddha establishing the fifth
precept.
I would tend to agree that the fifth precept is established later
than the other four. It is like the Buddha's first disciples only
took refuge in the Dual-Gem: Buddha and Dhamma (not Triple-Gem).
I do not dispute with the fifth precept, although I am a social
drinker. However, I like to point out an interesting phenomenon. We
all are aware that the most heinous crimes in history are committed
by sober men, not under the effect of alcohol or whatever. Yet,
Buddhists tend to highlight and emphasise the fifth precept as though
alcohol is the root of all evil. To me, it seems to be too "out of
the world", and it makes me wonder if that is why it takes so long
for Buddhists to be socially engaging, i.e. to really know the real
issues to tackle. Or, if that's an excuse for Buddhists not to face
real socal issues, especially if it means confrontation with others.
I think the Buddha's teachings is far beyond even the five precepts.
metta,
Yong Peng.
--- In Pali@yahoogroups.com, Alan McClure wrote:
"When Gotama arrived in Kosambii in 520 BC, all such things still lay
in the future. The king's indifference to the Sangha, however, was
obvious and was reflected in the low morale of the local monks. How
embarrassing for the Buddha to find the bhikkhu Saagata lying before
the city gate of Kosambii, dead drunk!. On his alms-round, he had
drunk a cup of palm-wine at every door. It was not exactly a
triumphal procession in which monks carried their intoxicated
confrere back to the monastery, doubtless to the accompaniment of
witty comments from the citizenry. This event provided the occasion
for the Buddha to issue an order prohibiting alcohol for the monks
(SV 51.1). Later he decreed that novices who were found to be
drinkers should be refused full ordination (MV 1.60)."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[Homepage] http://www.tipitaka.net
[Files] http://www.geocities.com/paligroup/
[Send Message] pali@yahoogroups.com
Paaliga.na - a community for Pali students
Yahoo! Groups members can set their delivery options to daily digest or web
only.
Yahoo! Groups Links